decision sent to author nature communications

25th Apr, 2017. eLife. 00ple`a`0000r9%_bxbZqsaa`LL@` N endstream endobj 53 0 obj 142 endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 6 0 R /Resources 12 0 R /Contents [ 24 0 R 28 0 R 30 0 R 32 0 R 34 0 R 36 0 R 38 0 R 40 0 R ] /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /CropBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Rotate 0 >> endobj 12 0 obj << /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageC /ImageI ] /Font << /TT2 18 0 R /TT4 16 0 R /TT6 14 0 R /TT8 15 0 R /TT9 25 0 R >> /XObject << /Im1 51 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 44 0 R >> /ColorSpace << /Cs6 22 0 R /Cs8 21 0 R >> >> endobj 13 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 905 /CapHeight 0 /Descent -211 /Flags 96 /FontBBox [ -517 -325 1082 998 ] /FontName /JEGBJH+Arial,Italic /ItalicAngle -15 /StemV 0 /FontFile2 45 0 R >> endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 117 /Widths [ 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 722 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 556 0 0 0 556 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 333 0 278 556 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /JEGBJH+Arial,Italic /FontDescriptor 13 0 R >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 121 /Widths [ 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 278 333 278 0 0 556 556 556 556 556 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 722 722 722 722 667 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 833 0 0 667 0 0 667 611 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 556 611 556 611 556 333 611 611 278 0 0 278 889 611 611 611 0 389 556 333 611 0 0 0 556 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /JEGBLI+Arial,Bold /FontDescriptor 20 0 R >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 122 /Widths [ 278 0 0 0 0 0 667 191 333 333 0 0 278 333 278 278 556 556 556 556 0 556 556 556 0 556 278 278 0 0 0 0 0 667 667 722 722 667 611 778 0 278 500 0 556 833 722 0 667 0 722 667 611 0 0 944 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 556 556 500 556 556 278 556 556 222 222 500 222 833 556 556 556 556 333 500 278 556 500 722 500 500 500 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /JEGBJF+Arial /FontDescriptor 19 0 R >> endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 891 /CapHeight 0 /Descent -216 /Flags 34 /FontBBox [ -568 -307 2000 1007 ] /FontName /JEGBIE+TimesNewRoman /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 0 /FontFile2 43 0 R >> endobj 18 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 32 /Widths [ 250 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /JEGBIE+TimesNewRoman /FontDescriptor 17 0 R >> endobj 19 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 905 /CapHeight 718 /Descent -211 /Flags 32 /FontBBox [ -665 -325 2000 1006 ] /FontName /JEGBJF+Arial /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 94 /XHeight 515 /FontFile2 42 0 R >> endobj 20 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 905 /CapHeight 718 /Descent -211 /Flags 32 /FontBBox [ -628 -376 2000 1010 ] /FontName /JEGBLI+Arial,Bold /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 133 /FontFile2 50 0 R >> endobj 21 0 obj [ /Indexed 22 0 R 255 41 0 R ] endobj 22 0 obj [ /ICCBased 49 0 R ] endobj 23 0 obj 1151 endobj 24 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 23 0 R >> stream 85,307,200 Downloads (in 2021) May 2022 lewmar 185tt bow thruster parts . In the out-to-review analysis, we observed a significant difference between the OTR rate of papers by male and female corresponding authors of DBPR papers. For some journals, the status may include the decision term e.g. This page provides information on peer review performance and citation metrics for Nature Communications. How much time does the scientific journal 'Nature' take from - Quora An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' form or a link to the online version of this agreement. palabras en latn con significados bonitos. In addition, the high prestige of these journals might accentuate an implicit referee bias and therefore makes such journals a good starting point for such an analysis. sean penn parkinson's disease 2021. korttidsminne test siffror; lng eller kort pipa hagel. We investigated the uptake of double-blind review in relation to journal tier, as well as gender, country, and institutional prestige of the corresponding author. Search. How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? This can be due to quality or referee bias. It was on December 21, 1968, that Apollo 8 launched from Cape Kennedy, in Florida, sending US astronauts Frank Borman, James Lovell Jr and William Anders on the world's . We found a significant result (2=37.76, df=2, p value <0.001). The prestige of the corresponding authors institutions was measured from the data of the Global Research Identifier Database (GRID) by dividing institutions in three prestige groups with reference to the 2016 Times Higher Education (THE) ranking. Because of the small size of the data set for accepted papers and of the lack of an independent measure for the quality of the manuscripts, we could not draw firm conclusions on the existence of implicit bias and on the effectiveness of DBPR in reducing or removing it. 0000001568 00000 n 'Completed - Accept'. Each indicates a particular phase of the review process that usually happens in a certain order, however an individual submission can skip a phase, or return back to an earlier phase, depending on Editor actions. References from one article in a journal to another article from the same journal are removed, so that Eigenfactor Scores are not influenced by journal self-citation. Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systems If you require assistance, please scroll down and use one of the contact options to get in touch. We first analysed the demographics of corresponding authors that choose DBPR by journal group, gender, country, and institution group. 0000004437 00000 n The present study focusses on the effects of this publisher intervention in the 2years following implementation and can guide others when evaluating the consequences of introducing DBPR to their journals. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z. Hi, it depends from the Journal but normally you can wait more days. This might be due to referee bias against review model, or to a lower quality of DBPR papers, or both. Each journal is able to customize the wording of the status terms, but the same status phases apply to all journals using Editorial Manager. When the decision is finalized, you will receive a direct email with the overall editorial decision, Editor and/or reviewer comments, and further instructions. We inspected the gender assigned via the Gender API, which assigns an accuracy score between 0 and 100 to each record. Which proportions of papers are accepted for publication under SBPR and DBPR? Barbara McGillivray. Posted by May 21, 2022 upphittade katter vstervik on jag har avslutat min anstllning autosvar engelska May 21, 2022 upphittade katter vstervik on jag har avslutat min anstllning autosvar engelska Abstract: The abstract not exceeding 150 words and preferably in . Either behaviour may apply to different demographics of authors. Thus, our unit of analysis is identified by three elements: the manuscript, the corresponding author, and the journal. This status will remain until an Editor takes an action in the system to change the status, usually inviting reviewers. We tested the null hypothesis that the populations (institution groups 1, 2, and 3) have the same proportion of accepted manuscripts for SBPR manuscripts with a test for equality of proportions (proportion of accepted manuscripts 0.49 for group 1, 0.44 for group 2, and 0.41 for group 3). "This is an extension of the wisdom-of-crowds theory that allows us to relax the assumption that being in big groups is always the best way to make a . Because the median is not subject to the distortions from outliers, we have developed and provided the 2-year Median, derived from Web of Science data and defined as the median number of citations received in 2021for articles published in 2019and 2020. isolera golv plintgrund waiting to send decision to author nature. Information for other options are available on our Springer Nature Transfer Desk page. The Editor has made a decision and requested you revise the submission. We have informational videos that pertain to our Journal Suggester and Transfer Desk that take about five minutes each to listen to if you are interested in learning more about them. If you still have questions about what In Review can do for you or how it works, read our FAQ. This means that there is a statistically significant difference between the three groups. n - Some research has not found conclusive results [6, 7], demonstrating the need for further large-scale systematic analyses spanning over journals across the disciplinary spectrum. New submissions that remain Incomplete more than 90 days will be removed. 50decision sent to authorwaiting for revisionFigure 2 Article proofs sent to author 4. The underlying research question that drove this study is to assess whether DBPR is effective in removing or reducing implicit reviewer bias in peer review. Watch the Checking the status of your submission video for more information. Find submission status of your article / manuscript - Nature Support Authors might choose SBPR when submitting their best work as they are proud of it and may opt for DBPR for work of lower quality, or, the opposite could be true, that is, authors might prefer to submit their best work as DBPR to give it a fairer chance against implicit bias. statement and a higher likelihood for rejection) for double-blind than single-blind papers (p value <0.001, df=1, Cramers V=0.112 for first decision; p value <0.001; df=1, Cramers V=0.082 for post-review decision). process - Geological Society Of America Modified on: Thu, 30 Jul, 2020 at 4:54 PM. In order to measure any quality effect, we tested the null hypothesis that the populations (institution group 1, 2, and 3) have the same proportion of accepted manuscripts for DBPR manuscripts with a test for equality of proportions (proportion of accepted manuscripts 0.37 for group 1, 0.31 for group 2, and 0.23 for group 3). Moreover, DBPR manuscripts are less likely to be successful than SBPR manuscripts at both the decision stages considered (Tables5 and 10), but because of the above limitations, our analysis could not disentangle the effects of these factors: bias (from editors and reviewers) towards various author characteristics, bias (from editors and reviewers) towards the review model, and quality of the manuscripts. If you have no email from the journal and have already checked the spam folder of your mailbox, you may check if the submission . You have completed the submission and approval steps, and the article has been submitted to the journal. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. Table11 displays the accept rate by review type defined as the number of accepted papers over the total number of accepted or rejected papers. If you have submitted your manuscript to an Editorial Manager journal but you have not yet received a final decision, you can check its status online. We only retained a normalised institution name and country when the query to the GRID API returned a result with a high confidence, and the flag manual review was set to false, meaning that no manual review was needed. LZ. Scand J Econ. Once all author information has been resolved and extraneous or incorrect information removed, the system will guide you to the Manuscript Information tab. Research Integrity and Peer Review We decided to exclude the gender values NA and we observed a significant but very small difference in the acceptance rate by gender (Pearsons chi-square test of independence: 2=3.9364, df=1, p value=0.047; Cramers V=0.015), leading us to conclude that manuscripts by female corresponding authors are slightly less likely to be accepted. In order to test whether the proportions in different groups were the same, we used the test of equal proportions in R (command prop.test). 0000012294 00000 n The dataset contains both direct submissions and transfers, i.e. Post Decision Manuscripts Decision summarynature. If you choose to opt in, your article will undergo some basic quality controlchecks before being sent to theIn Reviewplatform. Cookies policy. bounded rationality . Decisions are to be made by consensus. In the SBPR case, we cannot reject the null hypothesis. hoi4 what to do when capitulate. For more information, please visit Press J to jump to the feed. If you have no email from the journal and have already checked the spam folder of your mailbox, you may check if the submission . 0000062196 00000 n 2016;14(1):85. This reply will be sent to the author of the Correspondence before publication. The full model has a pseudo R2 of 0.03, and the binned plot of the models residuals against the expected values also shows a poor fit. Type of Peer Review BBRC is a rapid communications journal. Am Econ Rev. Because the median is not subject to the . Corrected proofs returned by author 5. If an author wishes to appeal against Nature 's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Our commitment to early sharing and transparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. (The FAQ has more details about the mechanics of how this works.). This work was supported by The Alan Turing Institute under the EPSRC grant EP/N510129/1. The meaning of 'reject & resubmit' is to indicate that in principle the editor likes the topic for their journal, but the current paper is . By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. sean penn parkinson's disease 2021. korttidsminne test siffror; lng eller kort pipa hagel. Help Us Celebrate Legal Talent. Springer Nature. manuscripts originally submitted to a journal and subsequently transferred to another journal which was deemed a better fit by the editor. (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Article Influence Score determines the average influence of a journal's articles over the first five years after publication. Based on the Nature Photonics Review Speed Feedback System, it takes authors 11.4 days to get the first editorial decision. ,.,., . Editors are always aware of the identity of the authors. A PDF has been built, either by you or by the editor, that requires your approval to move forward. For each manuscript, we used Springer Natures internal manuscript tracking system to extract name, institutional affiliation, and country of the corresponding author; journal title; the manuscripts review type (single-blind or double-blind); the editors final decision on the manuscript (accept, reject, or revise); and the DOI. 0000004476 00000 n The following is an example of a poor cover letter: Dear Editor-in-Chief, I am sending you our manuscript entitled "Large Scale Analysis of Cell Cycle Regulators in bladder cancer" by Researcher et al. EDR proposed the study and provided the data on manuscript submissions and the gender data from Gender API. Third review was never returned so decision was at least partly based on two reviews from the same discipline. Nature Double anonymity and the peer review process. Correspondence to Depending upon the nature of the revisions, the revised paper may be sent out for additional review or it may be accepted directly. Timely attention to proofs will ensure the article is slated for the next possible issue. 2006;81(5):705. Table6 shows the counts and proportions of manuscripts that were sent out for review or rejected by the editors as a function of peer review model. We focus on the Nature journals as that portfolio covers a wide range of disciplines in the natural sciences and biomedical research, and thus, it gives us an opportunity to identify trends beyond discipline-specific patterns. 4;N>0TjAWSI#|9aJs]PZYp M#M%,f-);k'\C/*('O2 X(^tL4[msd\5n9cIh(?J0yVg5[5(z,|j}(mLR:V#P/lAD~"jhQT H+}0Z3Nj>!76{7#FMxgiqyym qo=CFf.oA:+ 6hlXT?:SNMZ/|)wj 44X7^tkp+:LL4 Sodexo Disney Springs, We also attempted to fit a generalized linear mixed effects model with a random effect for the country category, as we can assume that the data is sampled by country and observations from the same country share characteristics and are not independent. 2017;12(12):e0189311. Your new or revised submission has been sent back by the Editorial Team for changes prior to review. The Editor may be reading and assessing the submission, assigning additional editors according to the journal's polices, or taking some other action outside of the system. The results on author uptake show that DBPR is chosen more frequently by authors that submit to higher impact journals within the portfolio, by authors from certain countries, and by authors from less prestigious institutions. Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage. We used a significance threshold of 0.05. That is, authors that feel more vulnerable to implicit bias against the prestige of their institutional affiliation or their country tend to choose DBPR to prevent such bias playing a role in the editorial decision. isolera golv plintgrund This agreement provides: A supported path for UC authors to publish open access in Springer's subscription-based and open access journals, including Springer, Springer Open, BioMed . In the post-review analysis, we found that DBPR papers that are sent to review have an acceptance rate that is significantly lower than that of SBPR papers. For other authors characteristics, such as institutional prestige, a quality factor is more likely than for gender: it is not unthinkable to assume that on average manuscripts from more prestigious institutions, which tend to have more resources, are of a higher quality than those from institutions with lower prestige and fewer means. The original authors are given 10 days to respond. If we compare the proportion of accepted manuscripts under DBPR and authored by female vs. male corresponding authors (26 vs. 25%) with a test for equality of proportions with continuity correction, we find that there is a not a significant difference in female authors and male authors for DBPR-accepted papers (results of two-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction: 2=0.03188, df=1, p value=0.8583). The difference, however, is very small. 2017-07-13 11:21. Accessed 15 Jan 2017. Next, we investigated the relation between OTR rates, review model, and institution group (Table10) to detect any bias. As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer than you had anticipated. Download MP3 / 387 KB. 9. Note that once completed reviews for your submitted article have been received and are under evaluation by the handling Editor the status may later return to 'Under Review' if additional reviews are sought. The result was a p value below 0.05, which shows that removing any of the predictors would harm the fit of the best model. If authors choose DBPR, their details (names and affiliations) are removed from the manuscript files, and it is the authors responsibility to ensure their own anonymity throughout the text and beyond (e.g. Corresponding author defined. Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the paper - another week. Accessed 15 Jan 2017. The height of the rectangles is related to the significance and the width to the amount of data that support the result. Hb```f``5g`c`} 6Pc. %PDF-1.3 % In any 6-month period, manuscripts can be under editorial assessment . The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. decisions for these programmes are taken by panels of independent experts and Nature Research editors play no role in decision making . The available data cannot tell us if other factors, such as the quality of the work, play a role in the choice of the review model. Are you sure you do not want to provide feedback? This is because online submission has completely abolished the uncertainty of postal speed, an obstacle faced when manually submitting a manuscript. The results of a Pearsons chi-square test of independence are as follows: 2=378.17, degrees of freedom=2, p value <0.001; Cramers V=0.054 and show that authors submitting to more prestigious journals tend to have a slight preference for DBPR compared to SBPR. Research Square notifies authors of preprint posting, and sends a link to the author dashboard. The Alan Turing Institute, London, England, Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Modern and Medieval Languages, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Springer Nature, 4 Crinan Street, London, UK, You can also search for this author in Since the models showed a bad fit to the data according to accepted diagnostics criteria, further interpretation of the models is not warranted. We aimed at modelling OTR decisions based on the following variables (and all their subsets): review type (SB/DB), corresponding authors gender, the group of their institution (1, 2, 3, or 4), the category of their country (Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, South Korea, the UK, the USA, and Others), and the journal tier (Nature, Nature sister journals, and Nature Communications). Over the past years, several studies have analysed the efficacy of DBPR in eradicating implicit bias in specific scientific disciplines. First, we calculated the acceptance rate by gender, regardless of review type (Table12). ISSN 2041-1723 (online). The results of a likelihood ratio showed that the more complex model is better than the simpler ones, and its pseudo R2 is the highest (though very low). Thus, we cannot draw conclusions on any editor bias. This result does not change significantly if we focus on the three institution groups we defined (high-, medium-, and low-prestige), thus excluding the fourth group for which no THE rank was found (Pearsons chi-square test results: 2=49.405, df=2, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.064), which means that authors from less prestigious institutions tend to be rejected more than authors from more prestigious institutions, regardless of review type. . In WeWork, the Delaware Court of Chancery found that the use of Sprint email accounts by Sprint employees doing WeWork-related work for SoftBank caused the communications between SoftBank and those individuals to lose the privilege that might otherwise have attached to them. (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. Table14 shows acceptance rate by institution group, regardless of review type. We found a small but significant association between journal tier and review type (p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.054, df=2). Most journals have online submission systems, which have definitely made it easier and quicker for authors to submit their manuscripts. In Review. manuscript under consideration 40editor decision started. Nature CommunicationsNatureNature CommunicationsPeer-review Nature Communicationstransparent peer-reviewget Nature Communicationsget50% Nature Communicaitons Example: Blood Cancer Journal: Go to the 'Publish with us' drop down menu: Click on 'Submit manuscript' in order to be directed to that journal's manuscript tracking system: For the status of your submission to Scientific Reports,go to the Scientific Reports contact webpage for email addresses to determine which one best fits your requirements. PDF Brief Communications and Communications Arising - Ju Li Click here to download our quick reference guide to journal metrics. . 0000001335 00000 n decision sent to author nature communications posted by Manuscript then goes into said editor's pile, and waits until it gets to the front of the line. We investigated any potential differences in uptake depending on the journal tier. In the past if your work wasn't accepted in Nature or Science researchers would often try the respected general journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, or PNAS - which wags dubbed "Probably Not . There, it will become a permanent part of the scholarly recordthat means that your manuscript will permanently remain publicly available, regardless of whether the journal you submitted it to accepts it or not. The decision may need to be confirmed by multiple Editors in some journals, and the Editors may decide to seek additional reviews or assign another Editor, returning the manuscript to an earlier status. It's simple! For most of our journals the corresponding author can track the article online. No, Modified on: Mon, 26 Jul, 2021 at 6:04 PM. We also analysed the OTR rates by gender of the corresponding author, regardless of review type. How do I check the status of my manuscript? Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. nature~. Hathaway High School Staff, For Coupons, Giveaways, and Free Games to play with your family, distance between underground pull boxes fiber optic cable, richest instagram influencers non celebrity, big spring correctional center inmate search, rachael newsham and dan cohen relationship, giorno giovanna you will never reach the truth japanese, 34 eye opening photos of the great depression, Real Cuban Link Chain For Sale Near Mumbai, Maharashtra.

decision sent to author nature communications 2023